Did Phillip K. Dick Foresee The Ebook?

Cover Image, THE THREE STIGMATA OF PALMER ELDRITCH; Available At Amazon.com or your local bookstore.

A couple of months ago I read The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch for the first time, and ran across a fleeting reference PKD makes to a device called a “Great Books animator”.  It’s an odd machine, really.  At first glance, I wondered if PKD had foreseen the ebook.  Ultimately, I have to say that no, he didn’t — but it is vaguely (admittedly, vaguely) similar.

Here’s the scoop, straight from the book’s protagonist, Barney Mayerson.   Take it away, Barney!

“… ‘You insert one of the Great Books, for instance Moby Dick, into the reservoid.  Then you set the controls for long or short.  Then for funny version, or same-as-book or sad version.  Then you set the style indicator as to which classic Great Artist you want the book animated like.  Dali, Bacon, Picasso…the medium-priced Great Books animator is set up to render in cartoon form the styles of a dozen system-famous artists; you specify which ones you want when you originally buy the thing.  And there are options you can add later that provide even more.”

Such a device would open a cornucopia of possibilities up to the reader.  One of the characters chimes in that her choice would be “Augustine’s Confessions in the style of Lichtenstein — funny, of course.”

PKD’s Great Books animator predicts a day when books will be customized to the extreme.  I’m curious what readers of this blog think.  Will anything like the Great Books animator ever make it to market?  Would you buy it?  What book would you want to see animated?  In the style of which artist?  In what tone?

Reality Bites: “Terrifying Vistas” In The Work Of Lovecraft & Phillip K. Dick

Fall 2010 Issue of Zoetrope: All-Story

“Ed rubbed his forehead wearily. ‘I – I got in on something. I saw through. I saw something I wasn’t supposed to see.’”

Phillip K. Dick, “Adjustment Team”

“The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the deadly light into the peace and safety of a new dark age. “

H.P. Lovecraft, “The Call Of Cthulhu”

Warning:  This essay includes spoilers for the Phillip K. Dick novels A Maze Of Death and Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?

* * *

Last evening I read Phillip K. Dick’s short story “Adjustment Team” (Zoetrope: All Story published it in their most recent issue; a film loosely based on the story is slotted to debut next spring).

I’ve not read a huge amount of Dick’s work yet (besides the story, I’ve only read three of the novels). But I’ve read enough to wonder if there aren’t certain thematic similarities between his fiction and that of another of my favorite authors, H.P. Lovecraft.

Specifically, both Dick and Lovecraft write fiction in which the ignorance is bliss, and knowledge is terror.

In Dick’s work, this is illustrated by Ed Fletcher’s statement “I saw something I wasn’t supposed to see”; but also in Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep? – in which we encounter Rachel Rosen; the woman who is in fact a machine merely passing for a woman. It’s a theme also evident in A Maze Of Death, in which the entire first 90% of the book turns out to only have been a virtual reality mind game played by a doomed crew to kill time as their crippled ship orbits a dying star. The crew measures the success of each shared mind game by how much time they consumed before awakening to the grim awareness of their true situation.

A Maze Of Death may take place in outer space, but the real setting for it (and, arguably, most of Dick’s work) is the mind.

In Lovecraft’s fiction, a similar theme is played out on a stage no smaller than the cosmos itself. An astronomy buff from an early age, Lovecraft wrote fiction that reflected his understanding of a universe dwarfing all human concerns; a state of affairs that – if known and fully understood – robs humanity of any sense of significance.

The similarity in theme is countered by some distinct dissimilarity in lifestyle. Lovecraft barely married once; PKD married several times. Lovecraft comes across as up-tight, PKD as a bit of an unhinged 60s counterculture libertine. Lovecraft “was” Providence. PKD grew up a Bay Area boy.

Part of me wonders, though, if Lovecraft was just some sort of “PKD without the drugs”. Had Lovecraft been at a time and place to cross paths with someone like Timothy Leary, and had he experimented with LSD and amphetamines, would his fiction have turned out even more similar to PKD’s?  Would he have learned to enjoy and  get lost in the false-face that  hides reality rather than rip it away?

Alas, the world will never know. But that doesn’t mean we can’t speculate. And, apparently, I’m not the only one to look at the connections between HPL and PKD.

This year, at the first annual Phillip K. Dick Festival, one of the presenters named Erik Davis gave a talk about this very subject. He didn’t touch on the shared theme of blissful ignorance/terrifying knowledge but he did have many other interesting observations to make. I didn’t travel to the PKD festival to hear these remarks, but they are conveniently posted online for your listening pleasure.

Check them out at http://philipkdickfestival.bandcamp.com/track/erik-davis-on-dreaming-pkd-lovecraft

And please do leave me your thoughts on this topic. I’m interesting in hearing if others have sensed a kinship between these two great authors.

Phillip K. Dick: No Co-Author Needed

When in the course of human events an anonymous blogger for a  British newspaper declares Phillip K. Dick’s writing “literary ineptitude,” this Yank finds it necessary to respond.

The British newspaper in question is The Guardian which, about a month ago, published a snarky little piece entitled “What Phillip K. Dick Needed Was a Co-Author”.  I’m not quite sure how I missed this article and the little bit of buzz that followed in its wake.  Maybe fortune just found it fitting that I counter the British offensive against PKD on this, the eve of Independence Day.

But then again, it’s not just a British thing.  As author Ed Gorman recently said on his blog, “Attacking…Dick’s literary style is becoming a popular sport.”

It’s almost enough to lead this author (and reader) to hire Chris Crocker to perform a reprise of his (in?)famous Leave Brittney Alone video.

Almost.  Don’t expect “Leave PKD Alone” to be going viral on Youtube anytime soon.

The thing is, PKD doesn’t need me (or Chris Crocker, or the U.S. Marine Corps) to defend him.  The stories and the satisfied readers stand for themselves.  Readers enjoy the stories, on many different levels.  Critics be damned, that in and of itself suggests a successful artistic effort (all the more successful considering how far ahead of his time Dick was working).

Now, The Guardian has some points.  There have been moments when I’m reading PKD and find the prose merely “adequate”, it might even be — here and there — “clunky”.  But I find it more than compensated for by his experimental approach to storytelling, often — in his later work — revealing a sort of “fractal fraud”, in which one self-similar flim-flam envelopes another.  It’s an approach uniquely equipped to articulate our decade’s approach/avoidance response to the God concept.

PKD expresses this approach/avoidance with a soaring imagination fueled by vast reserves on knowledge on various different systems of belief.  The sheer creativity represented in the intricate weaving of theological systems is breath-taking, exhilarating, and in it’s own way, uplifting.

There are even times when PKD rises to the occasion and produces beautiful prose.  Prose that makes me gasp and raises goose bumps (look for me to post a few quotes here on my blog in the next few days, to provide some examples).

PKD needed lots of things.  A 12-step program for his amphetamine addiction.  Perhaps a course or two in social skills.  But he never needed a co-author.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.