Nicole Lobbies Hollywood For More Films Like BLACK SWAN

DID YOU KNOW...Theaters Keep "Relief" Ushers In A Bullpen In Case The "Starter" Gets Winded?

 

Nicole: Hi Hollywood, got a second?

Hollywood: Who the (bleep) are you? I’m busy. This is one of the most hectic weekends of the year for me.  ‘Tis the season to get butts in seats!

Nicole: I swear, this will only take a few minutes.

Hollywood: Give me a good reason why I should even give you that long?

Nicole: Because I get paid to tell stories. I love stories. I care about stories.

Hollywood: Oh, another hipster emo crybaby artiste, eh? (scrutinizing) Aren’t you a little old for that shtick?

Nicole: Okay, I was going to be subtle; but since subtlety doesn’t seem to come easily to you, I’ll just take the low road, like you did, and launch in with a crass ad hominem…

Hollywood (confused,interrupting): Homo ads? We love the (bleep)in’ homos! We buy ads on LOGO all the time!

Nicole (sighing): You suck!

Hollywood (exasperated): Hey! We’re a multi-billion dollar industry and you’re a new author that’s only made two pro sales.

Nicole: So far.

Hollywood (nodding, condescending): Okay, “so far”. Big deal. Give me another reason I should give a (bleep)?

Nicole: Because I’m one of those movie-goers you lost a long time ago. I’m a customer that you should try to get back. You’re a numbers guy. Didn’t you read that film attendance is decreasing? Do you think that might have something to do with how predictable and formulaic your stories have become?  Don’t you think a lack of creativity is to blame?

Hollywood: But America’s getting less creative each year! The average movie-goer’s mind can’t handle storytelling without all the predictable conventions!

Nicole: Honestly, at some point I think you just gave up on story altogether and instead shined the spotlight on CGI. Then on 3D.

Hollywood (looking at the ground, appearing suddenly despondent): Yeah? And?

Nicole: Then you just seemed to trot out old franchises for remakes and sequels. The last straw for me was when you had Indiana Jones survive a direct hit from a nuclear explosion.

Hollywood: Well (running hands nervously through receding hairline) a nuclear explosion really isn’t that different from a big boulder booby trap in an ancient temple. Both can kill ya!

Nicole (glaring): As Yoda might say, search your feelings, and you’ll find that I’m right. Well, he’d say it back-asswards because that’s how he rolls. But you get the drift.

Hollywood (now sobbing, contrite): Jesus Christ, you’re right, kid. I’ve seen the error of my ways. I do suck!

Nicole (now distraught that she’s brought Hollywood to tears): Well, you don’t suck all the time. I really dug Black Swan.

Hollywood (in-between sobs): R-really?

Nicole: Yeah, I did. I mean, I was a little worried when the theater showed a trailer for this movie called Sucker Punch. Boy, did that look like a big, expensive, turd of a film. The whole audience laughed at it. But Black Swan, itself, rocked. In fact, that’s the reason I flew out here all the way from Indiana to talk to you. I saw it last night and I can’t stop thinking about it.

Hollywood: You saw Black Swan in Indiana?

Nicole: No, it gets even better. I saw Black Swan in Kentucky!

Hollywood: They show art films in Kentucky?

Nicole: Is it really an art film? It reminded me of a feminist mash up of Hitchcock, The Twilight Zone, and All About Eve, with a pinch of Looking For Mr. Goodbar. It’s sad that any type of good storytelling gets put in the “art house” ghetto. It makes me wonder…if Vertigo was released now, would it be an art house film?

Hollywood (daydreaming): A Vertigo remake. That’s just what we need!

Nicole: Nooooo!

Hollywood: Hehe…just kidding! I gotcha, didn’t I?

Nicole: Well, after that Psycho remake

Hollywood (interrupting): Okay. You made your point, Little Ms. “I’m A Smart Redneck”. Still, you have to agree that Black Swan is a film that has art house appeal; so it made sense to start distributing it there before branching off into mainstream theaters.

Nicole: Well…fair enough. I can see how it might have been seen as an Oscar ™ vehicle for Natalie Portman. And it did remind me a little of the Ingmar Bergman film, Persona.

Hollywood: See?

Nicole: But it’s laced with enough erotic scenes to bring in curiosity-seekers. When I went last night, a group of four teenage boys were in the audience. I think they just wanted to see Queen Amidala’s boobies.

Hollywood: Teen boys came to see this picture? Really? (salivating over hitting a core demographic)

Nicole: Well, yeah. There were a lot of younger people in the audience. One or two struck me as a little too young. There was that 12 year old girl with her grandmother who sat across from me. I’m pretty sure they were expecting a nice, sweet ballet picture.

Hollywood: Sheesh, that kid’s gonna need therapy!

Nicole: True. But for an older audience, the movie was like therapy. It was a cautionary tale about the good old “Madonna/Whore” dichotomy, about self-acceptance, about the all-consuming passion involved in all creative projects, and the dangers of losing yourself to your art.

(Hollywood ignores Nicole and begins instant messaging on his iPhone.)

Nicole: See? You’re not even listening to me! And you wonder why I stopped watching movies.

Hollywood: Au contraire, I listened to what you said about the teenage boys coming to the theater, and I’m pushing for the development of a movie tie-in video game!

Nicole (eyebrow raised): Black Swan: The Video Game?

Hollywood: Maybe even a sequel!

Nicole (sarcastically): Why don’t you just heavily edit and re-release Black Swan as a superhero film. She could be the female sidekick of Black Panther.

Hollywood: Holy shit, kid! That’s brilliant! What are you doing wasting your time story telling when you could work for a studio? We could use a bright young, idea woman like you!

Nicole: No thanks, Mr. Hollywood. You sit around here and you spin your little webs and you think the whole world revolves around you and your money. Well, it doesn’t, Mr. Hollywood. In the whole vast configuration of things, I’d say you were nothing but a scurvy little spider.

Hollywood: Is that how you really feel?

Nicole: Well, no. But it sounded cool when George Bailey said it to Mr. Potter. That’s the thing. Movies used to be built on strong dialogue. Memorable characters. Unpredictable stories with a satisfying (but not always happy) ending. Okay, here’s the real truth. I want to love you again. I want things to be like they used to. If I didn’t care so much, I wouldn’t have come all this way. Look at what you’ve done to yourself.

God (taking the form of Andy Kaufman, levitating while sitting lotus): Nicole? This is God.

Nicole: God? What are you doing here? You look a lot like…

God: I’ve taken the form of someone you admire, so that maybe you’d listen to what I had to say. Step away from Hollywood. Let him go. Enjoy the rare treat that makes it out of the studios (like the one you just saw). Take in a few indie films when you can. But most of all, read. You know books don’t let you down the way movies do.

Nicole: But wait! Doesn’t Black Swan prove that I should give Hollywood another chance?

(Hollywood continues instant messaging on his iPhone)

God: Hon, he’s just not that into you.

Great Moments In Bizarro History: Ayn Rand’s 1946 Letter To Walt Disney

anthemI have to confess that — up until yesterday –  I’d not read any of Ayn Rand‘s work (although I’ve heard a little about her ideas over the years).

A couple of days ago — while browsing a local Borders store — I skimmed the first few pages of some of her books in the literature section.   That’s sort of how I separate the wheat from the chaff, in my reading life.  I pick up a book and read the first paragraph.  If it snags me, I’ll buy it.  If it doesn’t, it goes back on the shelf.

Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead didn’t snag me.  But Anthem did.

Unlike her better known work, Anthem is a work of speculative fiction — a dystopian story set in a near future in which a new dark age has overtaken humanity and individuality is squashed.  Even the word “I” has been outlawed, and our protagonist (named “Equality 7-2521″ )  refers to himself repeatedly as “we” .

It is a tale about leveling — a tale about a state that worships equality to such a degree that any talent is discouraged (because talent implies uniqueness, and uniqueness is blasphemy).

It is, all in all, a grim tale to start off with.  It should go without saying that this piece of work is not exactly Disneyesque.

And yet, Disney was exactly the man who Rand wanted to bring Anthem to the silver screen.  In the introduction to Anthem, Rand’s “intellectual heir” Leonard Peikoff quotes from a letter Rand wrote to Walt Disney.  I haven’t read the letter in its entirety, but the quoted section itself is slightly amusing.

Rand writes to Disney that if Anthem were ever made into a film, “I would like to see it done in stylized drawings, rather than with living actors” (Hint, Hint…Walt).

The idea of Disney taking on Rand’s statist dystopia (“Walt Disney’s ANTHEM”) makes my brain hurt.    It’d be like if Disney had filmed Orwell’s 1984.  It’s just…not-very-Disney.

Perhaps I’m thinking this way because Disney has, fairly or unfairly, come to symbolize suburban conformity.  At the very least, from a  feminist perspective, classic female Disney cartoon characters were never iconoclasts.  They defined their success as snagging the right man (Cinderella) or changing the wrong one into the right one (Beauty & The Beast).

Granted, at the time Rand wrote Disney, the theme parks hadn’t been built.  A generation hadn’t been inspired to don silly mouse-ear beanies.  But surely, Rand had to have some sense that she was barking up the wrong tree.

But then again, maybe not, a quick Google search of “Ayn Rand Walt Disney” revealed that an Ayn Rand quote appears emblazoned on the wall of a Disney attraction, The American Adventure, at Epcot Center.

Which just heightens my resolve to add the Disney/Rand connection to my list of Great Moments In Bizarro History.

This Day In Bizarro History: Graham Chapman & Monty Python

Today marks the 40th birthday of Monty Python’s Flying Circus.  Yesterday was the 20th anniversary Graham Chapman‘s death.

It’s time for a Python Post.

I can’t say I’ve been a longtime fan of the Pythons.  I grew up a sheltered kid in rural America, and so never even heard of the Monty Python until I made it to college (just a few years after poor Graham Chapman left us).

But once there, I ran into a veritable army of geeks who seemed to speak a different language.  They’d been allowed to go off to Renaissance Fairs when they were teenagers (while I only heard about them on t.v.).  Heck, even my t.v. viewing was limited.  They’d gotten to watch t.v. shows like Mystery Science Theater 3000 (while my family was some of the last hold-outs against cable television).

But nothing made me more isolated than when they spoke this odd language of theirs.  High-pitched fake English accents yipping (sometimes drunkenly)  “We are the Knights Who Say Ni!  Your mother was a hamster and your father smelled of elderberries.”

Then they’d laugh.

I’d found out over time that the lines were from Monty Python and The Holy Grail.  In college, I’d watched The Holy Grail along with its superior successor, The Life of Brian.  I liked The Life of Brian, but didn’t know what the fuss was about.  What was it that led people to be so devoted to this stuff that they memorized the lines?

I thought the Python fans were just a brood of geeky histrionics united by their broken sense of humor.

Fast forward to this past summer.  My husband bought a boxed set of the BBC’s Monty Python’s Flying Circus (1/2 off at our local bookstore).

This was what the big deal was all about.

When I watched Flying Circus, I realized that I was enjoying an absurdist’s banquet.  I don’t want to take anything away from the Pythons later work (much of which I’ve yet to sample, to be honest).  But I’ve found that Flying Circus remains, some 40 years after its debut, the smartest program on television (okay, on DVD on television, but well, you get the point).

Yes, a lot of the humor is lost on me, as an American.  Flying Circus was, at its heart, a satire of the BBC (circa late-60s).  Some of the references must sail over my head.  Yet at its heart, the show was, I think, about taking any sacred cow and exposing it to a high-IQ, low-brow, absurdist roast.

In the world of Flying Circus, Great historical figures abound (often playing soccer football against each other, or competing in game shows, or making odd appearances in courtrooms).  Bishops strut around their neighborhood turf like Mafia dons, surrounded by an entourage of Luca Brasi-esque Priests.  CIA agents have their brains transplanted into dogs to perfect their disguise. Dysfunctional families compete for the honor of being the nation’s “Most Awful” brood, judged by a celebrity panel that would have made “The Gong Show” proud. Pantomime horses face a “life or death struggle” due to an economic downturn.

Skits stop without punch lines.  The fourth wall comes down.  Characters and situations reoccur out of place in the narrative.  Segues between skits blur reality and take storytelling in the fractal direction.  All of this decades before deconstruction became all the rage.

Such was the genius of Monty Python’s Flying Circus.

Which brings us to the late, great Graham Chapman.  Fans of Bizarro fiction should take note that it was Chapman’s influence that contributed the quality of high weirdness to much of Flying Circus. Chapman’s contribution to the writing of Python sketches was often to rev up the oddity to such a degree that it stopped being a change of degree and became a change of kind.

I consider Chapman a huge influence on the fiction I’ve begun to write as an author of Bizarro fiction, so I feel the need to give him the space he deserves.  Stay tuned for a Graham Chapman tribute in the next few days.

For more information on what the Pythons are up to these days, check out Python Online

Why I Don’t Watch Movies

Back in July, a friend of mine suggested that my husband and I should take a break from all the goofy, alternative films  we watch on DVD (Miyazaki, Kurosawa, Monty Python, Andy Kaufman, etc.) and instead just see a “regular” movie.

She suggested The Hangover.

Only the worst circumstances imaginable (a July 4th with our neighbors setting off fireworks from about 4 p.m until midnight) drove us from our home to the theater.  We figured anything had to be better than loud, unpredictable noise.

We watched The Hangover, and I found it to be not-so-loud, predictable noise.  So, I guess you could say it sucked slightly less than the fireworks going off sucked, so it was a win of sorts.   I just didn’t see what the big deal was.  It was the worst of all worlds — the “pointlessly-raunchy–unfunny-comedy”.  The Hangover could have been a funny stand-up comedy joke — that could have run a good five or ten minutes in skilled hands.

That’s not to say it didn’t have it’s moments — for example BEYOND HERE BE SPOILERS…

that odd Chinese gangster guy, for example.  I might even be able to watch a whole film about him — his aspirations, what his relationship with his mother is like, how he deals with the burden of leadership.  All that stuff.

But alas, I doubt anyone in Hollywood is thinking the same thing.  So we’ll never find out what a great film that would have been.  Of course, The Hangover was a smash hit summer blockbuster.  So, I guess we can expect Hollywood to churn out some Hangover clones in the next few years.

Yipee…

Anyway…this post sort of sums up how I feel about most movies and television programs.  I find them boring.  I guess that officially means I’m not in the mainstream, and don’t have my finger on the pulse of the the zeitgeist.  It doesn’t matter what the genre is….comedy, horror, action/adventure, romance…90% of them suck.

Back in the day, I used to enjoy a horror film or two, but even they seem just sort of (as they say in the blogosphere)  “meh”.

I’ve decided I’m not the target audience for films — at least not the wide-release films that you see at the theater.  Whenever I’m in a theater, I feel like I’m watching a flea circus (“okay — just where are the characters I care about, the drama,  the suspense, the humor?”).

“If you look real close”, I’m told, “you’ll see all that”.

I never do.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.